@jazz from hell Man, this is getting boring, but apparently we need to do this:
No, it wasn't. One person who took an issue with people being critical of right wing beliefs did the whole "just because she follows them doesn't mean she endorses them" spiel, which is utter nonsense. No, people don't follow politicians on social media they don't agree with, at least to some degree. She doesn't follow any leftist figures. She follows far right politicians and as I have told you multiple times, but you keep conveniently ignoring that: She has posted stuff that falls in line with what these far right figures say time and time again. That's not up for debate. That's a fact. So not only was it not "shown to be irrelevant", you are objectively incorrect on this.
Once again objectively incorrect. First of all, this discussion started prior to the image I posted. Secondly, even with the adjusted context, the image clearly shows her Zionist and conservative beliefs. Some people might be happy with that, I am not. I am free to mention that, call her out on her
public posts. That is not misogyny. Glad I could clear that up for you though!
Uh, no? What kind of pathetic strawman is that? lol
Not once did I claim that this is the "best proof". This was simply
one example of her public posts. She has a history of questionable content.
Whatever helps you feel better, I guess. You are blindly defending someone without the necessary knowledge. Instead of dismissing out of ignorance you should take a minute to look up some stuff.
Once again strawmen and a wild mischaracterization. The evidence wasn't disproven. I have told you repeatedly that she has a history of beliefs I personally find to be shitty and it is my right to say that. It's that simple. I've also explicitly told you that I have defended her from attacks on her appearance, because
those felt needlessly misogynystic. I've
also explained to you that I would say the same exact things I've said about her, about anyone else with those views. Just look up what I've had to say about Jon Schaffer on the forum. Learn to fucking read, instead of parroting bullshit.
Everything I've written is based on actual evidence we've seen with our own eyes. You are the one blindly defending her. The one thing that was posted with different context was acknowledged, yet even then her post showed beliefs I still disagree with.
Nothing I wrote falls under slander or is inflammatory. We are accurately describing her public posts. Also, you once again ignored that I didn't start that conversation, I wasn't the one to post the first image of her postings.
Once again, not only have you been objectively wrong on this, multiple times, you keep insisting the same bullshit after being explicitly told how none that was said falls under the umbrella of misogyny.
That is inflammatory and slanderous. I will keep calling out your fallacies and lies, so might as well call it a day and let us both stop wasting our time here
