Depends on what you define as good. The two albums I mentioned "became" the one Feverdog opened the topic with. ARLO and ARDO are for me more original, and came out the way they were intended:
The first had "new" songs (1986-1992) from The Fear of the Dark-tour, the second had songs from the Fear of the Dark Tour and the A Real Live Tour, and featured "old" songs (1980-1984).
There were 7 months in between these two releases. One came out a few days before the beginning of the A Real Live Tour, and the other two months after the end of it.
For me the early nineties era is important because the FOTD tour was my first, so these old releases feel more special to me, also because I can't separate this from the feeling that Bruce left the band in 1993.
The first came out shortly after Bruce said: I am going to leave the band.
The second came out after he had left the band. That feels very different.
I like A Real Live One better because of the song selections and -executions. It contains the best version of The Evil that Men Do, ever released. It's very fast and those drums are unbelievable. I also like FOTD better than later versions (faster than nowadays). Other highlights are for me BYDTTS and ATSS (fantastic, listen to that audience!).
You have all these songs, already. Another difference might be the booklets.