runningfree
Invader
ive noticed that nowadays maiden play quite a bit of their songs slower than the studio versions. i dont know when they started doing this, but i noticed this on rock in rio (almost all the songs are played slower than the studio versions). i also watched maiden playing at rock am ring on that live internet broadcast they had for it, and noticed the same thing. now im not necessarily saying that this is a bad thing...and sometimes slowing the tempo a bit i find actually makes the sound more powerful and heavy. but i just wish they would play some of their songs at least at studio speed. songs like iron maiden, wrathchild, sanctuary, prowler..a lot of the really early stuff..are supposed to be really energetic songs but maiden has slowed down all of these live, and although they still kick ass, i think they would be a lot better at at least their original speed so as to capture all the liveliness of these songs. even some newer songs could sound better faster..for example if songs like the wicker man or blood brothers or even fear of the dark could have been done had a higher tempo at rock in rio..i think i would have enjoyed the dvd a little more than i do now (not to say that i dont enjoy it already!!). now if you watch live at rainbow or beast over hammersmith or even maiden england, they play the songs normal speed or in some cases even faster then their studio counterparts (especially in the first two i mentioned). so does anyone know why they have slowed down? is it to lengthen their set to fit the time alotted to them instead of having to rehearse more songs? or is it just cuz their gettin old (thats probably not it but hey..i dont know!). so anyone have an idea?