Tournament of Instrumentals (r1): 45 vs 46 + 47 vs 48

Vote for your FAVOURITE instrumental song: 1 vote per battle


  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
This must be my round. If I remember correctly I suggested 3 of these. :P

46 is a fine instrumental in it's own right, but I prefer the short album intro that is 45.

47 is again fine but it's up against Villa (one of the few songs I have picked to win it), so 48.
 
45 huge and dramatic, but it's an intro, not a song.
46 is first-class slab of metal, 46 easy.

47 is fun, but nowhere near the competition. 48 easy.
 
Welcome: Eh, why is this in the competition?; as mckindog said, it's not a track.
1776: That was decent. Loads of nice guitar work, nice rhythm, nice tone; well constructed track. Easy winner, since #45 barely counts.
Vote goes with Iced Earth (#46).
No Quarter: This track is so fucking silly... but infectiously catchy. There's also some ridiculously good guitar lead work in there too.
La Villa: Like the best instrumentals, you forget it's an instrumental. Nice track. Easily the best of the four, I feel. Lovely, lovely guitar work...
Vote goes with Rush (#48).
 
Cheers!

Not sure if that question was serious but I'll answer it anyway: It is a track. Not a full song (according to your standards), but it is instrumental music and it was brought forward by one of the members. Expect more intros coming up in the game. Some of them might suit you better, who knows.

EDIT:
The Hellion is an intro and won its first battle. :)
Looking at that topic, again you and mckindog mention the intro aspect. Apparently you guys (and perhaps some others) make your own "set of rules". No prob of course but realize that these are your "rules" and not mine. As I explained, such tracks do count.

If
you find them awesome, might I suggest the following: why not leave out this restriction. Throw it overboard and see what's left and then compare it with its opponent. Subconsciously you might have already done this but I sure notice that you have been making a point of it (which once again can be your individual tastes, but have nothing to do with the idea behind the game itself: short tracks don't have to be lower class only because they are short).

EDIT 2:
I realize that I did use the word "song" pretty often, and perhaps it may have contributed to any possible confusion (I just made some adjustments in various topics that are connected to this game).
 
Last edited:
Not sure if that question was serious but I'll answer it anyway: It is a track. Not a full song (according to your standards), but it is instrumental music and it was brought forward by one of the members. Expect more intros coming up in the game. Some of them might suit you better, who knows.
If an artist presents it as a singular artistic creation (a track), then I'm fine with that; it's just a little hard to compare it to tracks of a more substantial length. Plus, this opens (or opened) the criteria for inclusion too wide for me. Literally anything could have appeared in this game. Obviously you're fine with that (& it's your game!), but I wouldn't personally have left it that open.
The Hellion is an intro and won its first battle. :)
Looking at that topic, again you and mckindog mention the intro aspect. Apparently you guys (and perhaps some others) make your own "set of rules". No prob of course but realize that these are your "rules" and not mine. As I explained, such tracks do count.
Again, I didn't (as you noticed) vote for it; mainly because I don't really think it counts as a track. Not because I didn't like it. I just think for the purposes of this game you should have been a little stricter with the entry criteria. Having said all this, the chaff will be filtered out in this opening "round" anyway. The strong will go through & later head-to-heads should be quite interesting.
If you find them awesome, might I suggest the following: why not leave out this restriction and see what's left and then compare it with its opponent.
But I find solos "awesome"; this doesn't mean I find an entire track/song awesome. The bigger picture, how a track is constructed & arranged, how it flows, development, how interest in maintained, how sounds are brought back & presented in different forms, etc etc --none of these "tracks" can possibly be judged on this criteria; criteria that I'm interested in judging tracks on. It makes comparison, in my view, difficult. They're soundbites to me. I'll not generally be voting for them, but I'll be interested in how far they progress.

In general though, I'm actually trying not to comment too much at this stage, since I hope to perhaps comment more fully in later rounds; & hope other people give more detailed thoughts on tracks they really like or find interesting too.
 
(I edited my previous post a few times, during the time you posted)
Literally anything could have appeared in this game.
Don't worry, the game is not that "infested" by intros. On the contrary. But seriously, I would listen to the upcoming candidates before you discriminate them too much in advance! ;)
Again, I didn't (as you noticed) vote for it; mainly because I don't really think it counts as a track. Not because I didn't like it. I just think for the purposes of this game you should have been a little stricter with the entry criteria.
That's a shame. It's your choice but the point of the game is really something else: make a choice based upon which track you like more, not "which track counts more as a track". Another point of the game is letting people share what they find cool. Putting limits on that blocks involvement, and that's something I didn't want to do yet (probably because this game is new).
They're soundbites to me. I'll not generally be voting for them, but I'll be interested in how far they progress.
There's one in particular coming up which is arranged quite far (maybe even further than the average "song"). Anyway, I hope I can convince you to also let the feelings speak, instead of only being led by these pre-"arranged" "rules", because I believe you can be more open towards it, when there's less restriction. If not, no prob, I am glad you play this game!
In general though, I'm actually trying not to comment too much at this stage, since I hope to perhaps comment more fully in later rounds; & hope other people give more detailed thoughts on tracks they really like or find interesting too.
I know you haven't opened all registers yet. :)
 
Don't worry, the game is not that "infested" by intros. On the contrary. But seriously, I would listen to the upcoming candidates before you discriminate them too much in advance!
No! I'll discriminate indiscriminately against anything under one minute in length! :p
It's your choice but the point of the game is really something else: make a choice based upon which track you like more, not "which track counts more as a track".
But if it ain't a track...:innocent:
Another point of the game is letting people share what they find cool. Putting limits on that blocks involvement, and that's something I didn't want to do yet (probably because this game is new).
Foro, seriously, the sheer size of the opening round is probably blocking involvement. Although, to be fair, there is quite a lot of voting; just not that much comment.
There's one in particular coming up which is arranged quite far (maybe even further than the average "song").
I'll surely view it as a track then? ;)
Anyway, I hope I can convince you to also let the feelings speak, instead of only being led by these pre-"arranged" "rules", because I believe you can be more open towards it, when there's less restriction.
Feelings?! Bah. No, you've not convinced me...
If not, no prob, I am glad you play this game!
You might not be glad by the end of it! :lol:
I know you haven't opened all registers yet.
Is it that obvious I'm holding back on the comments? :D
 
Back
Top