Thoughts on music culture and loyalty

Invader

Ancient Mariner
Finding these forums and participating in the discussions has been an amazing eye opener for me.  Here I have discovered dozens of like-minded individuals who treat music in exactly the same way as I do: with respect.  In real life I have met so few people who are musically similar to myself that I can count them with one hand; this forums is full of them.

Before I begin this rant, I would like to point out that I am mainly discussing Finnish "teenager" musical culture.  I do not have serious experience with adults, mainly because I don't really know well any adult that listens to metal.  So just bear that in mind.

It frustrates me to see how music is basically raped by Finnish youth.  For me the stereotypical finnish teenager is, music-wise, a faceless robot with an iPod crammed full of mislabelled downloaded MP3-files.  He has all kinds of genres, ranging from disco to death metal.  He has dozens', if not hundreds', of artists' music, and probably the only name of a musician of one of those bands that he knows is Ozzy Osbourne (not that he knows how to spell it).  AC/DC is spelled ACDC, AC DC, AC-DC, AC.DC, ADCD, and probably the only band with no alternate spellings is dio (uncapitalised, of course).  There are songs with the wrong artists labelled on them, and covers are never performed by who they are said to be performed.  Song titles have mysteriously changed places.  If you look at the album lists you'll find as many albums as songs.  And of course he has never bought a CD from any of these artists.

I was exaggerating a bit there, but not that much, and many people are like that.  Now, I'll also have to confess.  That's pretty much exactly how I got into music, or more specifically metal (not quite so exaggerated though).  That was about three years ago.  I got loads of downloaded MP3 files from friends, some of them wrongly labelled and misspelled, with missing album/year/etc information, as well as downloading some of my own.
Now of course this all sounds very hypocritical.  But that is not what I am now.  Step by step I moved from arranging and labelling them properly, to downloading entire albums, to actually buying them.  I still have downloaded music in abundance, but I have resolved to buy all of it legally.  I'm currently working my way through it, since I obviously don't have the money to do it all at once.  I'm trying to maintain a rate of at least one CD per month.  Of the CDs that I do own, I have all of them copied into MP3 files on my iPod (I don't have anything against iPods by the way, though it may have sounded like it), complete with composers, years, cover art and even lyrics.  I would say I have come a long way from how I started music, and look back with distaste.  But still, I consider that the end justifies the means, because I might never have got into Maiden were it not for downloading.

Other people mostly think I'm stupid for actually buying albums; after all, why buy when you can download for free?  This brings me to my second topic, namely loyalty.  People say that Maiden fans are a very loyal bunch.  From my experience, I would have to say the same.  All the more faithful music listeners I know listen to Maiden.  As for myself, I am fanatically loyal to Maiden.  At times perhaps too loyal, at the expense of other great bands.  Compared to the musically normal people of my age, this is quite unheard of.  Not so long agone of my classmates, when scrolling through my iPod and checking my artists, exclaimed that "you have so little" (11 artists).  Well, yes and no.  I have around 600 songs (of which about a quarter is owned, so far).  I tried to explain that a lot of that is Maiden, Metallica, Priest, AC/DC, and Iced Earth, but he pretty much looked down on me.  My point is that loyalty for bands is very low, which also means that very few people buy albums.

And another nail into the coffin of music: how *much* people have of it.  It's easy to get a lot when you get it for free.  It is not uncommon for a person to have 1000 songs.  I myself have around 600, but that includes many duplicates - live songs and the like (I have 8 versions of TNOTB!) simply for completeness.  And even those 600 are quite much and I would like to know them better.  Having too much just alienates you from your songs, unless you have accumulated those over a very long period of time.  I can recognise at least the artist and usually the song for a large portion of my music, but that is rare among others.  I know only a couple of people who know the lyrics of entire songs; the rare times the "average" person knows the lyrics of a song, it is either the chorus only or the song itself is horrendously overplayed (or is instrumental  :bigsmile: ).  I consider lyrics an important part of songs, but the same cannot be said of most people I know.

Sorry for the negative tone and lengthy post, but I needed to let off some steam.  If you're like the stereotype I talked about (not very common here, I would suppose), I hope you're not offended.  I'm just very frustrated with the state the music culture and music business is going.  But then again, I guess everyone has the right to listen to music how they want...

So, other people want to comment on their experiences, perhaps with different age groups and nationalities?
 
Some good points made about this download culture that exists. It does seem that people who do download, I believe, care less for their music than those who buy the CD. A CD is a better product that a bunch of files on a HDD/iPod/whatever. I don't see a problem in those who sample music they have not heard by downloading it, but those who build a music collection from illegitimate downloads - well, that is up to them, it's just not for me.

As a slightly older person than some on here, most people of my age are quite happy to buy CD's and so on but it does strike me that so many have no real passion for music. This baffles me! Did they ever have it in the first place. An example of this is one work colleague talked of himself as a teenager buying a Black Sabbath album - only to impress this girl he wanted to date. Still to this day, he could not even name one track from this album (or even the albums name) he probably discarded when he and she broke up.
 
Downloading music is one of the most important resources in today's musical society.  Sites like MySpace and Last.fm are great for previewing bands and tracks, but they are limited in their song selection.  Using clients like BitLord (ignore Limewire etc. unless you're really desperate) allows you to preview entire albums at high quality, properly tagged and with complete information about the album.  I'm a member of the 'try before you buy' mentality, and if I hear about a band, and think I may like their stuff, I will download it first more often than not.  However, I usually give it one or two listens, let it sit for a while, come back to it, and if I like it, I'll put it on my wish list.  If not, I delete it.  Simple as that.  Since I usually clean out my music collection of unwanted, unowned albums every few months, I usually have about 10+ albums that I've downloaded.  Probably about 20+ on top of that are CDs borrowed from friends, but I listen to these less, and usually delete them unless they're very good.

So, currently on my hard drive I have around 30+ albums (not counting bootlegs or Thingfish) that I don't own, and want to get at some point.  Naturally, my desire is to eventually buy all of these, but I think that I'm always going to have some album or other on my computer that I don't own...it's too good a resource for sampling music to give up.  However, I am firmly loyal to the artists I like, and I will buy their album, if it's good enough.  Currently, I've filled my mp3 player completely with over 900 songs, and I'd say there would be around 5 albums on that that I haven't listened to yet (and the majority of my mp3 player is Maiden, btw :P).  Of those, I make sure all are labelled to the best of my ability (in terms of artist, album, title etc.), and I have a scant few single tracks from artists...those that I do have are ones I've been sent over MSN (Kreator, Bathory, Artillery etc.), and I have listened to them enough to know them.

Essentially, download culture is healthy for young bands and old bands...misused, it can damage lesser-known bands (like King Diamond being unable to tour for one album because of file-sharing), but that is why I believe that you should be loyal to the artists if you download albums.  At the minute, Iced Earth's Alive in Athens, Burnt Offerings and Emperor's Anthems to the Welkin at Dusk and In The Nightside Eclipse are on my wish list for the future...as Bruce said in Stockholm '03 'In my opinion, there's a lot of shit music out there that is not worth spending money on...I don't mind if you download that!  But if you download [Dance of Death], and you like it, I trust you to forego 3 or 4 Swedish beers to buy it.  And if you think it's shit?  Fucking download it, I don't care...personally, I think it's a great record!' :D
 
You're right Raven, the more the music is heard, the better it is for new/young bands (after all, we need not be reminded about how "old school file sharing" - or the illegal distribution of their demo - got Metallica's ball rolling). Touring every day is not always enough.

I think Maiden have got the right approach to this whole culture (as from Bruce's quote) - buy it if you like it. I read a post on last.fm that made me laugh about Mettalica's attitude to it -
Also, perhaps it explains why Lar$ Ulrich hates the idea, people might understand how terrible albums like St. Anger are and not buy them.
:D
 
Here's just a little thought for all those opposing illegal filesharing and the likes (and all others, basically). I don't want to say that I support illegal actions, I just want to point it out.

In 1924, Florence Stoker, widow of Bram Stoker, undertook legal actions agains the 1922 silent film Nosferatu. Eine Symphonie des Grauens., which was based on the novel Dracula, but was not authorised. She won, and all copies of the film were destroyed.
The movie, nowadays hailed as a classic of silent film, horror film, and cinema in general, and considered a major influence on later works such as 2001- A Space Odyssey or Halloween, only survived because somebody had a pirated copy made previously, which he made available to Universal when they managed to overcome Stoker's blocking in 1930.
 
When I download music, I always make sure the filenames and tags are in order. This usually means fixing them myself, which can take several minutes per album, but it's worth it.

However, I will confess to owning a huge amount of music which I haven't paid for. I have 73.2 gigs of music currently sorted, and about another 15 gigs I'm working on. Let's see how much of that is illegal...

...a long period of counting ensues...

346 out of 1099 albums legally owned.  Bootlegs, classical music and individual songs were not counted.

Hmm. Maybe I should pay for some of these some day.
 
SinisterMinisterX said:
When I download music, I always make sure the filenames and tags are in order. This usually means fixing them myself, which can take several minutes per album, but it's worth it.

However, I will confess to owning a huge amount of music which I haven't paid for. I have 73.2 gigs of music currently sorted, and about another 15 gigs I'm working on. Let's see how much of that is illegal...

...a long period of counting ensues...

346 out of 1099 albums legally owned.  Bootlegs, classical music and individual songs were not counted.

Hmm. Maybe I should pay for some of these some day.

So that's why King Diamond didn't get to tour in support of Abigail II! :P
 
I'd like to note that Invader's analysis is nothing new.  During my early teens I remember one of my closest friends (let's call him Eric) illegally taping 8-tracks with mislabeled songs, etc.  He wanted to impress this kid (let's call him Steve) who was a well known metal fan.  Steve was aloof, cool and could not give a fuck of what anyone thought of him or his music.  You would not think of Steve as a metal fan in many ways.  (He took summer school just because he wanted to study grade 11 chemistry again).  He did not fit the stereotype.  Anyway, I went off on a tangent.

The point is that Eric cared only about metal in so much as he could associate some kind of popularity with it.  For example, he loved the black album, yet he could not recognize the riff from the 'Disposable Heroes' even though he wore the 'Master of Puppets' T-shirt all the time.   ::)  At that time even I recognized it because I'd heard it so much hanging out with Eric.

Years later, through exposure I got into metal more and more and Eric got into dance music because he wanted to impress the girls.  ::)  When I told this to Steve, he just laughed.

My point is that poseurs and people who are not really into music for the sake of the music have always existed and always will.  The reason why it seems more prevalent today is because the technology has advanced so much that it is simply easier and more convenient to just download and not give the care and time a song/album/artist truly need.

Invader, I do not feel you are a hypocrite.  You recognize the wrong way of listening to music and you obviously care about the bands you listen to.  I have nothing against downloading, so long as you buy the music, if you're going to keep listening to it.  You did and are doing so.  Good for you!
 
very interesting thread !!
each one of you has written something really nice
[...]
downloading :
it's something technically not legal but also something you can't avoid ...not in nowadays
I find it 100% moral
If I like something I will buy it
but most important : I will go to the concert ...
...so even if I discovered by downloading, finally I will still help the group by paying the ticket
speak to other people
 
____no5 said:
but most important : I will go to the concert ...
True, this is a far better way to support a band - to go and see them live.
 
Well, I'm afraid my post is not as nice as some others, no5. ;)

I don't mind downloading, 'til a certain extent.

For me, downloading = discovering
Taste it --> know it --> buy it or dump it.

Some bands I have discovered because I have downloaded an album of them. Sometimes it made me run to the music store, sometimes it took longer to realize that an album or a band is really great for my own taste.

If I really like something a lot (I realize that I will play it often or that I have played it often) I buy it.
On a sidenote: my ears hear the difference between mp3s and a CD.

Now the loyalty part. This connects to the "doom of downloading".
Forgive me for being critical but when I read SMX's post, I really don't understand that he doesn't buy more, simply to support an artist. I find it disloyal and maniacal. And impossible to have real passion for the music and not to forget the artists. Maybe SMX has only respect and passion for older bands and does his collection of cd's consist mainly of bands who were surrected in the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's.

Let's not forget that a lot of younger bands with good music are rising up and trying to make it or at least survive.

If we all would only download their music and not buy it, then in let's say 10 or 20 years, when all the older bands are gone, not a single metal band will exist anymore.

Metal bands have always survived because their fans were loyal, nothing more, nothing less. OK , they have to make quality music, but they don't survive because they're having as much airplay as pop bands.

So visit their concerts and buy their CDs.

Downloading young bands is not healthy if we do not spend a penny on their CDs.

This is the view of someone who has an immense passion for music that he likes. Maybe I am lucky that I have a job so I can afford to buy music. I can imagine that's it's more difficult to buy music when you're younger and have no income. To those people I say: don't feel too bad about it. Grow older and then you'll see and learn (and have money!) to change ways.
 
Forostar said:
Well, I'm afraid my post is not as nice as some others, no5. ;)

I found your post excellent !!  :)
even I don't agree 100% with you


Forostar said:
Let's not forget that a lot of younger bands with good music are rising up and trying to make it or at least survive.

If we all would only download their music and not buy it, then in let's say 10 or 20 years, when all the older bands are gone, not a single metal band will exist anymore.

Metal bands have always survived because their fans were loyal, nothing more, nothing less. OK , they have to make quality music, but they don't survive because they're having as much airplay as pop bands.

So visit their concerts and buy their CDs.

Downloading young bands is not healthy if we do not spend a penny on their CDs.

yeap, you are right but you forget something important : the new bands were born with the -hughily important - internet explosion...they have to find new ways to survive, this is not bad at all...Still, the older bands have to realise the same thing that the times have changed ...and they have to revisit some things

I am all-right with that, as with concert support and not with the buy support, the groups will be theoritically more independent from the label, something that I find exciting, at least !!

For the other hand, if I really like something, I will go and buy it -or wish I could buy it-
definately not for helping any band but for my personal mysterious reasons -a kind of fetishism ?

for me, the meaning of the art is communication, not making money, is the need to tell your message
your story...

I distribute my writtings and give my CDs hand by hand... Never wanted to do otherway
Some friends that we had start together, they took some other way : contracts with labels
Cds in the market, etc...
I learn that they start to be known back in my country
but still -I never wanted to be in their place !
living from my art ? I find it dangerous ...for my art !!

Forostar said:
This is the view of someone who has an immense passion for music that he likes. Maybe I am lucky that I have a job so I can afford to buy music. I can imagine that's it's more difficult to buy music when you're younger and have no income. To those people I say: don't feel too bad about it. Grow older and then you'll see and learn (and have money!) to change ways.

I'm working some ten years now, but still, I can buy just a certain number of CDs every month
... because working means nothing the question is how much you earn by doing it  :bigsmile:

[...]

as I told you in the start I do like your post though,
there is a logic and a good spirit behind your action
and this is what really matters !  ;)
 
All depends on setting priorities. I don't buy that many CD's to be honest. Internet helps me to select. :)
 
I find your post interesting Invader because it's something that I've been thinking alot about recently. Your point about people having lots of music/artists on their ipods I find especially relevant with my age group (late teens). It seems that your music selection on your ipod is approved of or dissaproved of depending on how much different crap there is on there. If you don't have at least as many different artists as you have songs, then you're doomed. Speaking of which, if you have an entire album of anything, you must be a freak. What I also find to be degrading to music is how everyone looks through everybody else's ipod, not for the sake of the music, but for the sake of the image. Let me explain myself a little clearer...people look through the playlist and then determine from that your 'social position'. So, if you want to be considered popular, you download whatever is popular nowadays (hiphop, rnb, stuff like that I suppose?) then when someone says , 'hey, what you listen to?', you nonchalantly say, 'eh, nothing much, just this', hand them your ipod and you've gotten yourself a free ticket to Popularity Planet. This means that you don't care about the music, and you're just doing it for the image, which means that music suffers.

What often happens with me is when someone asks to see my ipod, I just say: 'I listen mainly to metal and classical music, so you're unlikely to find anything on there that you'd like'. I know what they want to see, and I tell them in advance that they ain't gonna get it. Yes, I get critisized for listening to 'loud noise', but then there's always the argument that I don't make you listen to it by cranking up the volume so much that everyone hears it. Ah yes, and now I will rant about the volume and the people who do this. These people annoy me 'bis gehts nicht mehr'. In my experience these are usually the people who listen to techno, or whatever gets played at disco's. They crank it up and destroy not only their ears (I don't care about that), but also advertise to everyone else 'how cool they are because they dare to listen to their music loud, thereby destroying an otherwise peaceful bus ride'. For me, music is a personal experience. It's great to share it with others in the appropriate setting (concert for example), but not when you're riding public transportation. Your taste isn't everybodies taste. Respect that. But hey, my generation has no respect. Which brings me back to the actual topic at hand.

I think downloading music is a good thing for 'tasting' the music and for the reasons Forostar (I think) was talking about. If you like it, buy it. If you love it, go to a concert. If you don't like it , trash it. I don't download things, but I like to get samples from willing individuals on msn or something. If I like an individual song, I'll keep a lookout for releases from that artist. If I like an entire album, I'll do what I can to buy it. However, since many youngsters just do it for the image and not for the music, they don't respect the music, hence neither the artist, hence everyone downloads illegally. And we have ourselves a vicious spiral leading down into a dark abyss from which the music industry must struggle to climb out of.

There. I had a bit of a rant, but please excuse my frustration, it comes from going to school with idiots for too many years.  :mad:
 
Your point about people having lots of music/artists on their ipods I find especially relevant with my age group (late teens). It seems that your music selection on your ipod is approved of or dissaproved of depending on how much different crap there is on there. If you don't have at least as many different artists as you have songs, then you're doomed. Speaking of which, if you have an entire album of anything, you must be a freak. What I also find to be degrading to music is how everyone looks through everybody else's ipod, not for the sake of the music, but for the sake of the image. Let me explain myself a little clearer...people look through the playlist and then determine from that your 'social position'. So, if you want to be considered popular, you download whatever is popular nowadays (hiphop, rnb, stuff like that I suppose?) then when someone says , 'hey, what you listen to?', you nonchalantly say, 'eh, nothing much, just this', hand them your ipod and you've gotten yourself a free ticket to Popularity Planet. This means that you don't care about the music, and you're just doing it for the image, which means that music suffers.

Close, actually, but also a bit off.  The people I know don't really judge you by what you listen to that much; in fact, I listen to music that is (mostly) popular and "in".  Because I live in Finland, a.k.a. Metalland.  Hiphop, rnb, etc are really UNpopular.  But what makes me less "mainstream" is my music listening style, especially that I own *gasp* albums.  And over a third of my iPod is Maiden. :D  So while the bands I listen to are mostly "cool", my dedication is definitely "uncool".  But to be frank I couldn't care less, because I could never bring myself to listen to something just because it's popular and I won't change my music listening style just because others think it's useless.  And anyway, I'm not exactly a "cool" person anyway (I'm what most people would call a "geek"), so my music wouldn't help that anyway.

However, I'm not completely against someone trying to influence my music tastes.  I have a very narrow musical taste in terms of the music I own.  I know it wouldn't hurt to be a bit more open.  My friends know what I listen to and know what I don't like.  However, they try to get me to listen to some other metal bands that they think I would like.  They don't force me, they just suggest some bands to me and occasionally play them.  As a result, there are many bands that I like listening to but probably would not buy myself; I just listen to them from my friends' CDs and the radio.  This kind of subtle encouragement I don't mind, as it's good to broaden musical tastes.  But listening to something *just* because a lot of other people listen to it is bullshit.

As for downloading, I'm not against it really.  I would maybe never have gotten into Maiden, or possibly metal, were it not for downloading.  My main problem usually is that it is sometimes hard to find the albums I download.  Maiden is easy, but for example from Iced Earth I have only seen one single album (as in one CD, in one store, only once!) when hunting for music.
 
Ah yes, Finland, metal heaven! :D

No, I live in Austria, and here it's hiphop and rnb all the rage.
 
Natalie said:
Ah yes, Finland, metal heaven! :D

No, I live in Austria, and here it's hiphop and rnb all the rage.

I feel your pain.  In Canada, poppie half-naked all-chick bands, boy bands, and (c)rap rules the airwaves.

I read your lost post above.  I must say that was beautifully written and eloquent.  I have a definite mental picture of the musical atmosphere you're describing.
 
Well, the ironic thing is, that in Finland the radio really hasn't caught up with the musical preferences of the population... We only have one (perhaps two) dedicated rock channel(s), and the others hardly play rock...  -_-
 
Hi All,

V. interesting. I can hear the difference between mp3's & cds too. I don't like Ipods :puke: .
I like to have something to hold & look at.  :S I *like* going to one of those shops w/ records & posters on the walls, having something to hold, look at & treasure. I'm 24y.o. next week, & I *love* vinyl. I don't care if somebody :puke: over my music taste, but it always surprises people when I ask for something to be turned *down*. or people say how can I like this when it's something they don't *think*?

I've some old blues songs downloaded which I plan to get  *anyway*, so they'll go soon. I like John Otway a lot, & I might put one of his songs on if I need cheering up [he always cheers me up :D], but I wouldn't want to listen to him regularly without seeing him live.
 
Back
Top