Albie
Keeping an open eye on the Weeping Angels.
I'm not sure how this has been viewed/portrayed outside of the UK and India, but here the main talking point on seemingly every news bulletin is about the latest edition of the (crass) reality TV show Big Brother (this time round, with celebrities). What we have witnessed is a vulgar display of bullying that has almost crossed the line into full blown racism on one contestant from India (Shilpa Shetty - a Bollywood actress) by Jade Goody (only famous for being a former run-of-the-mill contestant). Read some stories here - links to further items can be obtained from the given page. If you do choose to read the article and some of Goody's comment (here - to refer to her as Shilpa Poppadom is nothing short of pure bigotry), you may get a picture of what has been going on.
So what has been the stance of the TV company (and/or production company) - well, they seem to think it's not "overtly racist" so they will not suspend the show (because the show is getting big ratings - admit it). Therefore, as it is not of a racist nature, it must be down to bullying - then why does that make it any better? To afflict racism or to bully another is a horrendous ordeal for the person on the receiving end - why then make racism a more serious offence than bullying? Ask the parents of a teenage boy/girl found dead from suicide due to bullying to say racism is a worse offence.
Both of these have been highlighted by the show and made available to the public for "entertainment". The problem I have with this, is that the main offender will worm her way back into the public's heart once again as if nothing has happened. I have seen this girl (Goody) become quite nasty on live TV before now and it has not overly surprised me the way she attacked Shilpa. Goody has made a fair few quid on the back of Big Brother and undoubtedly has many people to spin a facade for her for the public to adore - however, her PA's were not here to advise her on what to do/say/etc. and we were left with the raw personality - and this was not nice. On the eve of her potential eviction from the show, one UK tabloid (that has supported her in the past) had a headline the other day - "Evict the face of hate". Crap paper, but so nicely summed up.
Incidentally, she was up for eviction with Shilpa - Goody was overwhelmingly voted off. Good on you, voters.
Rant over - sorry, this has got my goat over the last few days.
So what has been the stance of the TV company (and/or production company) - well, they seem to think it's not "overtly racist" so they will not suspend the show (because the show is getting big ratings - admit it). Therefore, as it is not of a racist nature, it must be down to bullying - then why does that make it any better? To afflict racism or to bully another is a horrendous ordeal for the person on the receiving end - why then make racism a more serious offence than bullying? Ask the parents of a teenage boy/girl found dead from suicide due to bullying to say racism is a worse offence.
Both of these have been highlighted by the show and made available to the public for "entertainment". The problem I have with this, is that the main offender will worm her way back into the public's heart once again as if nothing has happened. I have seen this girl (Goody) become quite nasty on live TV before now and it has not overly surprised me the way she attacked Shilpa. Goody has made a fair few quid on the back of Big Brother and undoubtedly has many people to spin a facade for her for the public to adore - however, her PA's were not here to advise her on what to do/say/etc. and we were left with the raw personality - and this was not nice. On the eve of her potential eviction from the show, one UK tabloid (that has supported her in the past) had a headline the other day - "Evict the face of hate". Crap paper, but so nicely summed up.
Incidentally, she was up for eviction with Shilpa - Goody was overwhelmingly voted off. Good on you, voters.
Rant over - sorry, this has got my goat over the last few days.