Page and...?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
A

Anonymous

Guest
I know Led Zeppelin aren't a Metal band in the strict sense, but since this BB lacks a general music forum, and this doesn't really fit into the General Discussion forum either, I thought I'd post it here.

Earlier this evening, I had an interesting discussion with JackKnife in the Chatroom, in which we discussed the impact the individual band members had on the music of Led Zeppelin. We all know that Led Zep were pretty much the tightest group in Rock history, and this is why they disbanded after Bonzo's death. However, we also know that Zeppelin were essentially Page's band, and that he was the brain behind most of the music. With that in mind, Page was the centrepiece of the band, and it is fair to say most of the rest of the instruments (some individual songs disregarded) and the vocals were built around Page.

So, JackKnife and I were discussing which musician gave the band its most important trademarks next to Page. I personally argued it was John Bonham, as his drumming sound and style is one I would personally recognize out of a million. JackKnife brought up the valid point that while Zeppelin wouldn't be Zeppelin without Bonham, Plant was responsible for much of the atmosphere, especially by the songwriting on the third and fourth albums (also later, see for example "Kashmir"). LZ III really is Page and Plant's album, I must agree with that. However, many other Zeppelin pieces do not really profit from Plant. Much of what he is singing could be replaced with anything else and it would not make a difference- it is really the instruments that tell the stories (again, some individual songs disregarded). Listen to the first and second albums, or "Houses Of The Holy" to get the idea.

Onstage, it was clearly Page and Plant that carried the vision of Led Zeppelin, but in the studio, I personally think it was Page and Bonham. As for John Paul Jones, he really only appears as an invaluable member on the later records (Houses Of The Holy onwards).

However, at the end of the day, it really is the band as a whole, not the individual musicians, that make up the legend of Led Zeppelin.

Anyway, I would like to hear your opinions on this.
 
I agree that it was as a whole that Zeppelin were so good. They had a such a great understanding with each other, and no other band has clicked quite like they did.

You shouldn't underestimate the impact of any one of the four, especially John-Paul Jones whom a lot of people overlook; absolutely awesome on bass and keys.

I don't even think Jimmy Page was that much of a main man though; definitely not as much as say Angus Young. It was definitely the perfect chemistry between four brilliant musicians which made Led Zeppelin so fantastic.
 
[!--QuoteBegin-national acrobat+Dec 12 2005, 03:39 AM--][div class=\'quotetop\']QUOTE(national acrobat @ Dec 12 2005, 03:39 AM)[/div][div class=\'quotemain\'][!--QuoteEBegin--]...and no other band has clicked quite like they did
[snapback]124894[/snapback]​
[/quote]I feel I must relativise this statement. For one thing, you can't responsibly claim something like this. On the other hand there were bands that fed on chemistry that can't be called harmonious, and the resulting energy was unforgettable - Sex Pistols and Police come to mind.

As for Led Zeppelin, I agree with Perun: on stage it must have been Page but mainly Plant who created the atmosphere. In studio it became obvious how much Bonham contributed to what Zeppelin was all about. He was indeed one of the greatest drummers in rock and, for me, one of the beloved.
 
Wow, what a great thread. [!--emo&:)--][img src=\'style_emoticons/[#EMO_DIR#]/smile.gif\' border=\'0\' style=\'vertical-align:middle\' alt=\'smile.gif\' /][!--endemo--]
Welly, welly, well, I must say that everyone in that band brought atmosphere, like Perun previously said, it would have been a lot different, if they had anyother musicians, what I'm trying to say is that, everyone contributed in that band, while Jimmy Page gave a good part of the music, it wouldn't have been so good without Jones giving the rythm, or without Bonham backing all the sound, and it definetly would have been different without Robert Plant, I think no one's more important in the band.
 
[!--QuoteBegin-charlotte+Dec 12 2005, 11:57 AM--][div class=\'quotetop\']QUOTE(charlotte @ Dec 12 2005, 11:57 AM)[/div][div class=\'quotemain\'][!--QuoteEBegin--]I feel I must relativise this statement. For one thing, you can't responsibly claim something like this.
[snapback]124898[/snapback]​
[/quote]
Yes I can. In my opinion, Zeppelin were the perfect band, and the only other instance I can think of which has had such perfect chemistry is the Lennon-McCartney axis of The Beatles.
 
Back
Top