Maiden, Musical Taste and how You Think

What category best defines you?

  • Empathizers

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • Systemizers

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • Neither

    Votes: 3 33.3%
  • Look man, why we gotta define everything? (results)

    Votes: 3 33.3%

  • Total voters
    9

Mountil

Captain Charisma
Read an article today on a scientific study about your personality helping to define your musical taste. The results of the study seemed like common sense in a lot of ways, but I figured there is still something to discuss.

The article: http://music.cbc.ca/#!/blogs/2015/7/Your-musical-tastes-reveal-how-you-think-a-new-study

What I find very interesting is that I am very much an empathizer, I love folk, soft/indie/alt rock, and euro pop. I couldn't care less about punk and 99% of metal.

Maiden is the exception. The only metal band I listen to consistently. (I like a few Dio songs, and a couple Judas Priest songs but that's about it.) But, I love Maiden. They're the band I've listened to more than any other.

1. If you fall under the Empathizer category, what are the exceptions? Why do you think Maiden is one of them?Do these exceptions have something in common?

2. In general, do you guys agree with this study, and do you for the most part fit into either of these categories?

Full article:
Everybody has different tastes in music — but are your unique tastes linked to the way you think? A new study out of the University of Cambridge says yes.

Published in the journal PLOS ONE, the study, titled Musical Preferences Are Linked to Cognitive Styles, examines how cognitive styles influence our musical choices, and what the researchers found was that different personality types tend to have have distinctly different — and relatively predictable — tastes in music.

For the study, 4,000 participants were given tests to determine whether they were empathizers (people who are likely to recognize and respond to the thoughts and emotions of others) or systemizers (those more interested in the underlying rules and patterns of the world, such as weather systems, music, or car engines), or a combination of both.

The study found that people who score high on empathy prefer mellow music (R&B, soft rock, adult contemporary genres), unpretentious music (country, folk, singer-songwriter), and contemporary music (electronica, Latin, acid jazz, Euro pop). They did not like intense music such as punk and heavy metal.

Systemizers, on the other hand, love intense music, but don't like mellow or unpretentious styles.

The same held true within specific genres: empathizers liked mellow or unpretentious jazz, while systemizers preferred the more complex and avant-garde jazz.

The researchers also found that those who scored high on empathy preferred music with low energy (gentle, reflective, warm, sensual), negative emotions (sad songs) or emotional depth (poetic, thoughtful).

Systemizers, however, preferred music that was high energy (strong, tense, thrilling), and was associated with positive emotions (animated and fun). They also preferred music that was more cerebral and complex.

“Although people’s music choices fluctuates over time, we’ve discovered a person’s empathy levels and thinking style predicts what kind of music they like,” said researcher David Greenberg. “In fact, their cognitive style — whether they’re strong on empathy or strong on systems — can be a better predictor of what music they like than their personality.”

Greenberg, a jazz saxophonist, says the findings could be of great interest to companies that are in the business of predicting people's musical tastes.

“A lot of money is put into algorithms to choose what music you may want to listen to, for example on Spotify and Apple Music," he says. "By knowing an individual’s thinking style, such services might in future be able to fine tune their music recommendations to an individual.”

“This line of research highlights how music is a mirror of the self," adds senior author Jason Rentfrow. "Music is an expression of who we are emotionally, socially, and cognitively.”

So what are the kinds of songs that the two groups tend toward? Here is a sample:

High on empathy:

Jeff Buckley, "Hallelujah"

Norah Jones, "Come Away With Me"

Billie Holliday, "All of Me"

Queen, "Crazy Little Thing Called Love"

High on systemizing:

Antonio Vivaldi, Concerto in C

Alexander Scriabin, Etude, Op. 65, No. 3

The Sex Pistols, "God Save The Queen"

Metallica, "Enter Sandman"
 
Last edited:
Here's a couple of artists by which I've listened to a track this week (not coincidentally, I'm a fan of all of them)
  • Wu-Tang Clan (Hiphop)
  • Morbid Angel (Death metal)
  • Britney Spears (Pop)
  • Killing Joke (Post-Punk)
  • Mahavishnu Orchestra (Jazz fusion)
  • Depeche Mode (New wave, synthpop)
  • Bobby Brown (New jack swing)
  • King Crimson (Progressive rock)
  • Aphex Twin (Ambient, acid techno)
  • Taksim Trio (Turkish folk music)
  • Infectious Grooves (Funk rock)
I think I fall under the neither category. Mellow stuff is at a perfect balance with aggressive stuff. I'm an "atmospheric" listener, that's the foremost thing I care about when it comes to music. Its ability to create a world for itself, grab my full attention and suck me into itself completely. Almost all styles have some artists that are able to deliver on this, therefore I tend to listen to everything.
 
Last edited:
While this type of research interests me, I have never found a single concept of this black & white-type classification that applied to me or anyone I knew. Humans and our perception of things are so much more complicated than this. (I'd love to be convinced otherwise though.) In the end, I hardly think any researcher is going to say something valuable from conducting a study that somehow tries to measure something like "taste".
 
Back
Top