Search results

The Trooper scene was the highlight of the finale for me :D

The peace president broke the Geneva convention and launched attacks in a foreign country to capture their leader (and let's not kid ourselves, for oil) without congressional approval. Wonderful stuff. But I imagine Biden likes mustard on his hot dogs or something, that little freak, which...

Goddamn, this round is roooough lol 5 Rock in Rio [DVD] +2 5 Maiden England '88 +3 1 Eddie's Archive 1 Dance of Death +1 0 "From Here to Eternity" [alt. gatefold] 0 The First Ten Years No regrets

14 Killers +3 9 "Run to the Hills" +2 6 "Sanctuary" 1 "The Wicker Man" [alt. US promo] +1 0 "From Here to Eternity" 0 Donington Live 1992

Yuuuup, his Senjutsu stuff was the main reason for that comment :D

It's obviously not a proven fact (yet?), but it's insane that it is not an impossibility at this point. As far as allegations go of him raping minors, there have been multiple allegations for years. A bit of a "where there's smoke, there's fire" situation. It's also morbidly funny, that they...

The redacted Epstein files are such a shitshow: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf Not only is Trump a child rapist, he was also an accessory to infanticide (page 3). Let's see the olympic level mental gymnastics of pro-life folks to excuse this.

14 "Fear of the Dark (Live)" +2 11 "Aces High" 7 "The Angel and the Gambler" [alt. picture disc] +3 3 Maiden Japan [alt.] +1 1 "Wrathchild" [Japan] 0 "Futureal" Futureal is ugly, Wrathchild just a live picture, which are always boring. Aces High is a classic, but the Eddie is pretty goofy...

Have you read any of Steve's lyrics? It's like he's throwing cosmic dice. Sometimes you get deeply profound and borderline pretentious lines out of him. Othertime you get barely comprehensible gibberish resembling the English language.

Yeah, that's true unfortunately. Would've been great to hear a three-guitar version of it.

And this is another example why no one can take conservatives seriously. You are free to support him and to enjoy what is currently happening to your country, but when you deny the most glaring and simple facts just because it's inconvenient, it comes across as childish. Or you're just rage...

Please re-read my comment. None of this is actually relevant to the discussion. Of course playing with a different drummer changes the feel of a song. You aren't the only musician on here who has played with other people. I've already stated that Nicko is a great drummer with his own style...

You are conflating multiple things here. As I already said, Nicko is a great drummer, but he's just another musician. He's not some once in a lifetime musician. There are hundreds of amateur drummers out there who can perform Infinite Dreams perfectly and copy every little detail of Nicko's...

Can't agree with that. Nicko had a great groove but there's nothing magical about his playing (or 99.9% of any musician who has ever lived for that matter). There are plenty of amateur drummers who have covered that song in great ways. Simon is a professional who could've easily done that song...

The funniest thing to me is that out of everyone in this thread @Detective Beauregard is the likeliest to be consuming too much mainstream media. Fox News has the highest viewership compared to its peers after all. While many of us in this thread don't follow any of the large networks lol

Anyone who unironically uses TDS has completely lost the plot and is a profoundly unserious person. It's that simple.

The fact that there is a police presence proves that they are taking radical Islamism seriously, which in turn proves that your earlier claims were unfounded and contradictory. Glad you concede that you just made up stuff to be angry once again, that's all I needed :)

And to explain my confusion and why I'd like an answer: A rhetorical question is asked to make a point. Saying "it's time to stop denying radical Islamism exists" isn't a rhetorical question. It's a statement. Which begs the question "who is denying it?", otherwise we can't engage with this...

This has nothing to do with confrontation. I'm not asking which member said something along the lines. You made a pretty definitive claim that sounds incredibly outlandish and I would like to entertain that thought. I'm asking you how you came to such a conclusion. In other words: Who denies...

Who is saying they don't exist and aren't a real threat? Or are you writing several multi-paragraph posts about a made-up issue that doesn't actually exist? It's a simple question. "Not doing enough" and "Radicali Islamism doesn't exist and governments deny it's a threat" are two entirely...