Search results

The Lizz, no contest.

rip Fleetwood Mac

yawn Neeeeeeeeext!

Nope.

Maiden didn't have an official release until 1980(besides one demo in late 1979) and didn't even solidify their lineup until the 80's either. I understand what you're saying, but that doesn't exclude them from being lumped into movements in their respective time periods. I would agree with you...

I know that album was '87, but "1985–present" and this: Don't tell me they're not 80's man.

GnR has Appetite For Destruction, nothing else, and should've died along with the 80s.

BOC has Satan. Satan > Rolling Stones

This graphic will explain it better than I will. Point is, I'm very familiar with fast music, and have never liked Helloween. Just interested in what you had to say, in that regard.

So, what would you say if I don't like it either?

No thanks; neither.

Damn, got here too late. Would've liked to throw some Scale The Summit, Sithu Aye in there.

god certainly gave himself quite the set of chompers then.

Insanity.

Womp. Welp. Kreator is going to get crushed. I still don't quite understand these matchups. I can't stand Queen outside of a few songs. I can most certainly appreciate the talent, Roger Taylor is one of my favorite drummers ever, but I just can't do the music. Queen fans don't make me want to...

That's the spirit!

It's weird having some attention paid to my posts.. Why, yes, I don't even like Death Magnetic! And Slayer is clearly the pinnacle of heaviness, so I have no other choice but to listen to nothing but Slayer. All day. Every Day. SLAAAYYER. RRRRRRRGHHH. (DEATH TO SABATON!) RIP Black Wizard...

Fine. But you're wrong, and I hate you.

Anything associated with Nirvana: kill it with fire. Foo Fighters are the quintessential, generic "rock stars." I like Dave Grohl as a person and a musician; I very much enjoy his other projects. But sweet jesus, Foo Fighters are bad. They're just edgy enough to appeal to people looking to...