Search results

  1. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Hey, I just agree with the band for seeing the issue with Blaze and taking care of it... by getting Bruce back! Whether you like the Blaze era or not...the 'fact' is Blaze era was hurting sales (albums & concerts) , the fans spoke, the band listened and got Bruce back. I like what Bruce's...
  2. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Never said I was a bigger fan, I just know where you're coming from a little better now ...it's just a different perspective from being a fan during the 80's, then from someone who recently became a fan. Glad you're a fan!
  3. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Dang... most of you are only a few years from when your voice cracked...lol So you might have started listing to Maiden when Blaze was the frontman...I get it now, and see why your jockstraps are so tight concerning the Blaze topic. lol. :D Anyway, Maiden is BOSS! Up the Irons! ya earth dogs
  4. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Right, I disagree... I actually think X-Factor kind of stinks, (there are a couple songs that are ok, and would be better with Bruce)....woops there I go, not thinking like you again. It's outrageous I know...
  5. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Right...you are right. I will think like you from now on and stop inserting my opinions. I will reverse what I said "the Blaze era had huge record sales and great concert attendance... therefore Maiden chose to do the wrong thing and bring back Bruce and DOG-GONE-IT it didn't work...low record...
  6. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    It is what is implied when you say "You're the one having a hard time accepting that literally everyone in this thread disagree with you". In other words...everyone else thinks like this, therefore you must be wrong. You should think like us. All I am saying is the Blaze era hurt record sales...
  7. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Are you seroius, see your previous post, are you like 18 or something? So what if everyone disagrees with me...
  8. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    thanks for having a thought on why... #awesome!
  9. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    ...still no one has answered the question of ...Why did they fire Blaze? #justsayin
  10. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    And that is ok I didn't realize I was supposed to be in the same 'group think'. I don't need to be like everyone else. ...but no one has answered the question of ...Why did they fire Blaze? #justsayin
  11. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    But it's the "why did they fire Blaze?" that the reality deniers have a hard time with. I didn't call you a name like 'troll', now tht's just immature...lol #seehowthatworks?
  12. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    And clearly people have notoriously thin skins and no sense of humor. I have an opnion, others have an opinion and we disagree...and that is ok and we are discussing it. But it doesn't change the (dare I say) 'fact' that the Blaze was extinguished because it didn't work for Maiden's bottom line...
  13. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Ok clearly you people are insane!
  14. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Or reality might say...they were scrambling after Bruce left and tried to find a replacement that would help further their success, and then when it didn't work out that way...they brought back Bruce #reality (and Bruce's solo efforts weren't super amazing either) . Bruce needs Maiden and Maiden...
  15. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Ok then, maybe someday you might believe in reality. And recognize that Maiden is also a band/brand who market them selves to make money...and alot of it! To bring us some of the best live concert experiences in the world! #uptheIrons ya earth dogs!
  16. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    When the fans don't like what they put out...it's bad for business and Maiden knew it and the charts proved it. Maybe he said it was one of his fav's to boost interest in it? Maybe it would have been more well received if it were sung by Bruce. Just because he liked it doesn't mean he liked how...
  17. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    now that is funny! :D love it!
  18. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Many of you defending the Blaze era are just too young to know what Maiden was like in their heyday. I am super glad are fans now...because through the decades... Maiden is still the best band ever. But the band was realistic and knew Blaze was not good for business. You might want to realise...
  19. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Then Steve Harris and the rest of the band was wrong too when they recognized that the Blaze era was a chart dropper, and they were relegated to playing small theaters in the United States for the first time in forever. Reality is a good place to live in (and Steve and the rest of the band were...
  20. GhostSword

    Why not Paul Dianno instead of Blaze?

    Respectfully disagree.... The two Iron Maiden albums released during the Bayley era did not chart as well as the band had hoped. X Factor peaked at No. 8 on the UK album charts & Virtual XI hit only No. 16, both being the lowest-charting Iron Maiden studio albums since Killers was released in...
Back
Top