Bruce Dickinson

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
Azas said:
From Iron Maiden - España facebook:

"BRUCE DICKINSON HAS HIS NEW SOLO ALREADY READY: “IT’S ANTI-I.A. AND TOTALLY LIVE”.
While Iron Maiden remains focused on his live action, Bruce Dickinson isn't slowing down. The vocalist has confirmed in an interview with Rolling Stone that his upcoming solo album is now completely finished, although its release will not arrive until 2027.
The record, as yet untitled, was recorded earlier this year at Studio 606, owned by Dave Grohl, in California. And true to his character, Dickinson has opted for a straightforward, raw, and fireworks-free approach.
"Just finished a solo album: we did 16 tracks in 21 days, all 100% live." It's like the 'anti-I.A.' generation."
Far from hyper-edited productions, the singer wanted to capture the purest essence of live, something that fits perfectly with his artistic philosophy."
View attachment 46003
***

I’m starting to wonder if Bruce’s next solo album might lean more toward the spirit of No Prayer for the Dying, Tattooed Millionaire, or Balls to Picasso. Maybe lyrically angrier, more politically charged?

I’m drawing that conclusion purely from his recording approach—which, of course, could be completely wrong—but for me, that ‘straightforward, raw, and fireworks-free approach’ instantly gives off the aura of a street-level, attitude-driven album.

Then again, if the music ends up sounding mean, direct, and in-your-face, it could work really well.

You could also argue that Accident of Birth had a similarly raw and straightforward production approach, yet lyrically it was mystical and overall fantastic.

In any case, the hype is definitely building.
Click to expand...
Maybe an AOB/CW meets tattooed millionaire/no prayer for the dying style?
 
Azas said:
I guess it may feel easier for them. You’re sort of simulating a live performance alongside the other band members. That can be less stressful than the old-style studio approach, where every instrument is tracked separately and you keep chasing the best possible take - the right nuance, the right feel - playing the same part over and over again, maybe cursing when a passage or solo goes wrong and you have to do it all over again.

The same probably goes for vocals - standing in that claustrophobic booth and singing your heart out, trying to capture some version of an angelic or demonic choir.

And when you choose to record live in the studio, you’re aiming for a different kind of approach and already accepting a less polished outcome. As I said, different album themes and lyrical directions can sometimes even benefit from that rougher edge.

Although my understanding of the recording process may be completely outdated. Maybe you can record live in the studio and, thanks to today’s technical wizardry, the producer or engineer can still make it sound as polished as anything.

Don’t ask me - I don’t know. I really don’t.
Click to expand...

One of the best audiophile albums of all time is the first Rage Against the Machine and that was recorded live in the studio, even to the point of having a few fans there
 
I'm always torn internally. Is a 'live approach' a true display of artistic vision or a way to save money, and is announcing such things a preemptive PR strike before people get upset about the quality? Who knows :-D
 
Batman said:
I'm always torn internally. Is a 'live approach' a true display of artistic vision or a way to save money, and is announcing such things a preemptive PR strike before people get upset about the quality? Who knows :-D
Click to expand...
I don't think Bruce has any negative associations with that recording style. He probably genuinely thinks that this is something exciting, fresh and authentic in an era of overly robotic, sterile and quantized albums. In theory he's right.

I just hope that they did enough takes to be able to choose the very best for each song.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top