1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Metallica

Discussion in 'Music Discussion' started by Night Prowler, Jan 9, 2012.

  1. Forostar

    Forostar Ancient Mariner

    Metalligaga
     
  2. The Flash

    The Flash Dennis Wilcock did 9/11

    Thought so.
     
    Perun likes this.
  3. jazz from hell

    jazz from hell Educated Fool

    Good for you. But what's your and Perun's own provable definition of an artist?
     
  4. Forostar

    Forostar Ancient Mariner

    Album sales could be not part very important in that definition.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallica_discography
    2016. Metallica has sold more than 200 million albums worldwide, with over 60 million records in the United States alone (54,365,000 albums since 1991 when SoundScan started tracking actual sales figure).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Gaga_discography
    As of January 2016, she has sold an estimated 27 million albums and 146 million singles worldwide. She has also sold around 7.25 million singles in the United Kingdom, and 10.4 million albums in US; in the latter country she is the first and only artist to have two songs pass 7 million downloads ("Poker Face" and "Just Dance"). According to the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), Gaga is the fourth-best-selling digital singles artist in the United States, with cumulative single certifications of 59 million digital downloads and on-demand streaming.


    I would not be surprised if Metallica sold more albums when they had an eight an a half year long discography (this includes The Black album).

    Latest album figures (Metallica's latest album was released one month earlier than Lady Gaga's):

    Metallica: Hardwired... to Self-Destruct
    • Released: November 18, 2016
    US: 570,000
    • Worldwide: 2,500,000

    • RIAA: Gold
    • ARIA: Gold
    • BPI: Gold
    • BVMI: 3× Gold
    • MC: Platinum
    • RMNZ: Gold

    Lady Gaga: Joanne
    • Released: October 21, 2016
    • US: 435,000
    • FRA: 12,000
    • UK: 90,624

    • BPI: Gold
    • MC: Gold
    Lady Gaga a bigger artist? Well, she is a huge (digital) single artist. Album wise, Metallica is out of her league.

    Yes, Lady Gaga is a pop artist, but Metallica is so big that they dwarf most pop artists.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2017
  5. The Flash

    The Flash Dennis Wilcock did 9/11

    As I said, artists of different eras. Lady Gaga's first record came out in the same year as Death Magnetic. Physical copy sales are way down across the board. Metallica also put out 5 more studio albums. Most of Lady Gaga's generation of fans are millennials who are used to digital downloads.

    And even still, as you can see, the gap between their latest album sales isn't huge. And that's with Gaga's album not receiving a good reception. The argument is not huge enough to trump the other arguments.

    Were Metallica bigger than Lady Gaga in their primes? Absolutely. By quite a margin. But currently? Probably not.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2017
  6. Perun

    Perun At the Heart of Winter Staff Member

    That's a textbook example of moving goalposts. You challenge a claim, somebody else asks you for evidence, and you demand that a completely new claim that you make should be disproved instead. Wonderful.
     
    The Flash likes this.
  7. jazz from hell

    jazz from hell Educated Fool

    @Perun: Eh..? No. Read my post again. Perhaps 'judge them by their fruits' is more to your distinguished taste.

    ---

    Even if Lady Gaga was more popular than Metallica -- which I doubt she is --, it wouldn't make her a 'bigger artist'. Otherwise, you, Perun and Flash, might have been able to answer my counterquestion. Popularity ≠ artistry.

    Lady Gaga as 'Metallica's new lead singer' won't result in more than a bit of very temporary commercial value. It isn't ever going to be more than an ad hoc fun thing anyway (and why not?), so there's no point in getting all worked up about it.
     
  8. Forostar

    Forostar Ancient Mariner

    To discuss this (even remotely), it would be handy to know what people take into account when measuring greatness (or size).

    I find album sales and audience figures (concert attendance) important.

    Artistic integrity is also a factor I find very important, but this is (more) difficult to express in numbers.
     
  9. Perun

    Perun At the Heart of Winter Staff Member

    I have no idea what you're talking about.
     
  10. CriedWhenBrucieLeft

    CriedWhenBrucieLeft Ancient Mariner

    Can someone direct me to the Metallica thread?
     
  11. Forostar

    Forostar Ancient Mariner

    We're not exactly talking about two non-Metallica artists.
     
  12. The Flash

    The Flash Dennis Wilcock did 9/11

    The conversation is about which musical artist is commercially bigger. Nothing else. You're moving the goalposts by trying to incorporate artistic validity into it. Got it?

    Because they fit your agenda, right? Digital album sales, physical single sales, digital single sales, online streaming, none of that matters, because they favor Gaga in a big way.

    Are you suggesting Lady Gaga does not have artistic integrity? If so, that's a conversation ender right there because that's absolutely proposterous.

    We're talking about Metallica and Lady Gaga after Lars Ulrich said they'd like to incorporate Gaga into Metallica as a 5th member. Very non-Metallica related, I know.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2017
  13. Forostar

    Forostar Ancient Mariner

    Before this comparison started, I already found albums more important than singles. Albums focus on bigger works, on wider range of music.
    You can't use a greater number of albums against the size of an artist. It's part of it.

    We're individuals having and forming opinions on this discussed matter. There is no rule to measure an artist's size. That's why we contribute individually.
    So cut the agenda crap man. Cut the insinuations. It doesn't make the discussion better. I really don't know what moves you do change the tone. Maybe it's convenient for you but I wish you would see it's completely unnecessary. And very unpleasant too.
     
  14. The Flash

    The Flash Dennis Wilcock did 9/11

    I apologize for my accusational tone.

    Would you at least agree that Metallica isn't "way" bigger than Gaga and they're at the very least comparable?
     
  15. Forostar

    Forostar Ancient Mariner

    Thanks. Taking everything into account, probably yes.
     
  16. CriedWhenBrucieLeft

    CriedWhenBrucieLeft Ancient Mariner

    I think from a musical/artistic perspective history won't view either particularly favourably; but Gaga still has the advantage (over Metallica) of years to develop & keep producing music. I'm not personally making claims to her musical greatness (right now), but I don't see anything to indicate she won't keep developing as an artist. Metallica on the other hand haven't done anything interesting in decades.
    That ("way" bigger) was indeed nonsense Foro. As others have said; in their day, maybe. The gap isn't (or at least doesn't feel) that big though.
     
  17. Forostar

    Forostar Ancient Mariner

    Beginning of discussion: Lady Gaga > Metallica
    "End" of discussion: Lady Gaga < Metallica

    ;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2017
  18. jazz from hell

    jazz from hell Educated Fool

    The discussion was about who is a 'bigger artist', so it might be allowed to note that commercial success isn't what makes an artist big @The Flash. IMO. If my reply was too spartanic, I apologize as well. Still, no need for 'thought so'.
    It's the artist's *work* @Perun, ok? Again, IMO. Feel free to disagree.

    Again, no need for personal attacks. After all, we all love Metallica.
     
  19. Perun

    Perun At the Heart of Winter Staff Member

    The problem seriously was that your contributions were so vague and nondescript that it was not clear what you were trying to tell us or where you were coming from. Your point that a "big artist" is not by defined commercial success was not clearly made in the beginning, but instead taken as something obvious. It may be obvious from an artistic point of view, but this point of view was not advanced. Instead, two definitions of the word "big" were thrown against each other with no clarification, and this way, a misunderstanding occurred with the outcome we observed. Sometimes it's helpful to use precise language when trying to get a point across.
     
    CriedWhenBrucieLeft likes this.
  20. Perun

    Perun At the Heart of Winter Staff Member

    Is it a bad thing that the outcome of a discussion is the polar opposite of the premise it started with?
     

Share This Page