The Running thread

[____no5]

Yes, 158 is more “normal” but still good. Those numbers tell the story that you are much better for 5k than 10k as the equivalent of your 5k PB for 10k distance would be a sub 40’ time.

 

[GhostofCain]

Yes, 158 is more “normal” but still good. Those numbers tell the story that you are much better for 5k than 10k as the equivalent of your 5k PB for 10k distance would be a sub 40’ time.

I know. To be fair, I run 5k regularly (twice per week; sometimes more), while 10k runs are something that I just do a couple of times per year. It is much easier to do the former during my lunch break than the latter!

 

[DJMayes]

I recently set a 10K PB in a race! 55:50 overall time; not close to some of the times above but 2 minutes faster than my previous race best.

 

[____no5]

I recently set a 10K PB in a race! 55:50 overall time; not close to some of the times above but 2 minutes faster than my previous race best.

That’s a huge improvement, congratulations! 55:50 = 5:35/km not too bad at all