USA Politics

Trump Leaving UN-NWO with HR193 American Sovereignty Restoration Act 2017

The Trump administration and some members of the Republican Party continue to impress us.

They are now formalizing the US withdrawal from the United Nations, Inc., aka Khazarian World Order-One World totalitarian government, with the filing of House Resolution Bill No. 193, or the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017.

H.R.193 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Introduced in House (01/03/2017)
American Sovereignty Restoration Act Of 2017

This bill repeals the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and other specified related laws.

The bill requires: (1) the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and (2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.

The bill prohibits: (1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N., (2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and (5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.

Download original PDF here.
HOWEVER
While Donald Trump is doing his thing against the ex-Rulers of the World, the enemies are not taking this lightly at all, and are also threatening his properties, and those under his Trump franchise worldwide, with terror attacks.

Trump Properties Face Global Terror Risk With Presidency

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Businesses around the world bearing U.S. President Donald Trump’s name face an increased risk now that he is in the White House, security experts warn, especially as several are in areas previously targeted by violence.

As Trump remains a brand overseas, criminal gangs or militants could target buildings bearing his name in gold, abduct workers associated with his enterprises for ransom or worse, they say.

“They may kidnap a Trump worker and not even want to negotiate,” aiming for publicity instead, said Colin P. Clarke, a political scientist with the RAND Corporation who studies terrorism and international criminal networks.

Predicting an attack keeps police, intelligence agencies and security experts awake at night around the world — and, by its very nature, it remains speculative.

U.S. brands have been targeted in overseas violence before, but they never belonged to a president. That’s the difference. Trump becoming America’s 45th president presents a unique challenge given the range of his international business interests.

Asked about security issues, the Trump Organization said in a statement it has “extensive protocols in place at our Trump-owned and -managed properties” in the United States and abroad.

“Our team continues to work very closely with local law enforcement,” the statement said. “We are also working in tandem with the local developers at Trump-branded properties worldwide to ensure that all residents, guests and associates remain safe and secure.” The organization did not elaborate.

While Trump has said he will put his business assets in a trust and hand over management control of his company to his two adult sons and a longtime Trump Organization executive, it’s still his name on the projects.
 
Last edited:
I can't see the US withdrawing from the UN. There is a bill for it, but there has been a bill to do so in most Congresses in the last 30 years. The GOP won't be able to get the votes for it in the Senate - too many Republicans believe firmly in the role of the UN.

It should be noted that the UN really isn't a world government so much as it is a related series of NGOs that help push various helpful agendas, like feeding children, while giving international players an area to try to legally figure out who can do what to other countries. It's not perfect but reform is possible.

And I wouldn't be surprised if International terrorist actors now see Trump holdings as legitimate US government sites for targets.
 
All his money and he doesn't have the latest phone?

Also, I read that he said he thinks vaccines cause autism. However, the person he hired as head of the health department said they believe vaccines don't cause it.
 
No more refugees welcome in the US, for a while. This decision will especially effect women and children (72% in 2016).

... Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani campaigner for girls’ education who survived an attempted murder by the Taliban when she was 15, said she was “heartbroken” that America was “turning its back on a proud history of welcoming refugees and immigrants – the people who helped build your country, ready to work hard in exchange for a fair chance at a new life”.

She added: “I am heartbroken that Syrian refugee children, who have suffered through six years of war by no fault of their own, are singled out for discrimination.”

Madeline Albright, the former US secretary of state, said: “There is no fine print on the Statue of Liberty. America must remain open to people of all faiths and backgrounds.”

She was referring the inscription of the iconic New York landmark: “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”...
(source)
 
Last edited:
Current situation that's unfolding is ludicrous. There's anecdotal evidence of US citizens with dual nationality having trouble getting through border control. Hopefully the US courts kick Trump's blatantly anti-Muslim policies into touch & curb this world crazyman.
 
Complete banning of all citizens of countries from entry is pretty much admitting "Our security systems aren't good enough". How about you try to improve those, implement through checking instead of banning everyone?

Concern is legitimate, you absolutely shouldn't treat countries like Syria, Iraq, Libya, Sudan etc. as one and the same as other countries. But this isn't the way to do it. There are so many people in those countries who look to flee because they're afraid of the prosecution of terrorists and radical Islamists.
 
Trudeau has announced that Canada will take refugees who have passed US screening but are affected by the Muslim ban. That's something nice to hear.
 
How does this even make any sense?
Usually, airline companies won't let you transit through spaces you're restricted from, because what if you try to leave the transit zone, etc? Usually people aren't checked leaving transit zones. That's pretty standard. Canada won't let you transit through Canada without the eTravel Authorization now (unless you're American).
 
If all the psychograms floating around are correct, Trump, if he really is a narcissistic sociopath, has not forgotten this kind of humiliation.
 
Back
Top